Robotic Process Automation Readiness Barriers and Enablers in South Africa’s Energy Supply Chain

Keywords: Robotic Process Automation, RPA, readiness, supply chain, barriers, enablers, energy industry, South Africa, TOE, ADKAR

Abstract

South Africa’s energy industry faces ongoing challenges including power shortages, ageing infrastructure, and supply chain inefficiencies, while, limited empirical evidence exists on how organisations in this industry prepare for Robotics Process Automation (RPA) adoption. This study examines the RPA readiness barriers and enablers within the supply chain of South Africa’s energy industry. The research adopts a qualitative design grounded in the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework and the Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement (ADKAR) change management model to connect technological capability with individual and organisational readiness for change. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 18 professionals representing eight stakeholder groups, including supply chain managers, IT specialists, process improvement leads, and employees affected by automation. Four key readiness barriers emerged: readiness gaps (61 mentions), organisational misalignment (158), infrastructure strain (83), and job security and resistance (60). Corresponding enablers included leadership accountability, RPA governance and alignment frameworks, readiness checklists, structured communication protocols, KPI frameworks, capability audits, investment planning, psychological safety, and regulatory alignment mechanisms. The integration of TOE and ADKAR offers a novel dual-lens perspective that extends existing knowledge. The findings provide practical guidance for managers and policymakers seeking to strengthen organisational systems and structures with human readiness factors in emerging economies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Tshifhumulo, G. J. Heyns, and P. J. Kilbourn, "Supply chain risks in the South African manufacturing sector," Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, vol. 19, p. 1189, 2025, doi: 10.4102/jtscm.v19i0.1189.

M. Shamsuddoha, E. A. Khan, M. M. H. Chowdhury, and T. Nasir, "Revolutionizing supply chains: unleashing the power of AI-driven intelligent automation and real-time information flow," Information, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 26, 2025, doi: 10.3390/info16010026.

S. Waduge, R. Sugathadasa, A. Piyatilake, and S. Nanayakkara, "A Process Analysis Framework to Adopt Intelligent Robotic Process Automation (IRPA) in Supply Chains," Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 22, p. 9753, 11/08 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16229753.

S. Bagheri and R. van de Wetering, "RPA Ready? Unlocking Organizational RPA," in Disruptive Innovation in a Digitally Connected Healthy World: 23rd IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2024, Heerlen, The Netherlands, September 11–13, 2024, Proceedings, 2024, vol. 14907: Springer Nature, p. 14, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-72234-9.

L. Patrício, L. Varela, and Z. Silveira, "Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Process Automation: Literature Review and Proposal for a Sustainable Model," Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 21, p. 9648, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14219648.

P. M. Molepo, K. Aboalez, and T. N. D. Mathaba, "Analysis of Barriers to South Africa’s Energy Transition: Perspectives from industry experts," Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 88, p. 101777, 2025/10/01 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2025.101777.

N. Bhagwan and M. Evans, "A review of industry 4.0 technologies used in the production of energy in China, Germany, and South Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 173, p. 113075, 2023, doi: 10.17159/2413-3051/2022/v33i2a8362.

R. Depietro, E. Wiarda, and M. Fleischer, "The context for change: Organization, technology and environment," The processes of technological innovation, vol. 199, no. 0, pp. 151–175, 1990.

J. Hiatt, ADKAR: a model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci, 2006.

J. W. Creswell, A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications, 2014.

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, 2014.

M. Saunders, P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2019.

L. A. Palinkas, S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood, "Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research," Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, vol. 42, pp. 533–544, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

V. Braun, V. Clarke, N. Hayfield, and G. Terry, "Thematic analysis," in Handbook of research methods in health social sciences: Springer, 2019, pp. 843–860.

K. Sileyew, "Research design and methodology (pp. 1-12)," Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2019, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.85731.

N. Golafshani, "Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research," The qualitative report, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 597–607, 2003.

M. C. Lacity and L. P. Willcocks, "A new approach to automating services," MIT Sloan Management Review, 2016.

T. A. Paramitha, D. K. Tobing, and I. Suroso, "ADKAR Model to Manage Organizational Change," International Journal of Research Science and Management, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 141–149, 2020.

I. Fischer, M. Papert, T. Goertler, and G. Prockl, "Robotic Process Automation - A systematic Review of the Challenges to Implementation from a Logistics and Supply Chain Management Perspective," presented at the The Nordic Logistics Research Network - 35th NOFOMA Conference, Helsinki - Espoo, 2023.

D. Farinha, R. Pereira, and R. Almeida, "A framework to support Robotic process automation," Journal of Information Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 149–166, 2023, doi: 10.1177/02683962231165066.

J. Saukkonen, K. Kemell, M. Haaranen, and E. Svärd, "Robotic process automation as a change agent for business processes: experiences and expectations," in Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. A Virtual Conference hosted by Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ICSTE-IUL) Portugal, 22-23rd October 2020, 2020: Academic conferences international.

R. Syed, S. Suriadi, M. Adams, W. Bandara, S. J. J. Leemans, C. Ouyang, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, I. van de Weerd, M. T. Wynn, and H. A. Reijers, "Robotic Process Automation: Contemporary themes and challenges," Computers in Industry, vol. 115, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.103162.

D. Fernandez and A. Aman, "Planning for a successful Robotic Process Automation (RPA) project: a case study," Journal of Information and Knowledge Management (JIKM), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 103–117, 2021.

C. Intachomphoo, J. Millar, O. E. Gundersen, C. Tschirhart, K. Meawasige, and H. Salemi, "Effects of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics on Human Labour: A Systematic Review," Legal Information Management, vol. 24, pp. 109–124, 10/30 2024, doi: 10.1017/S1472669624000264.

A. Kulikowska and E. Wszendybył-Skulska, "Energy companies’ readiness for the digital transformation of the purchasing process," (in eng), E a M: Ekonomie a Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 33–55, 2025 2025, doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2025-5-004.

Published
2025-09-30
Abstract views: 278 times
Download PDF: 103 times
How to Cite
Motsoeneng, M., Segooa, M., Motjolopane, I., & Kgopa, A. (2025). Robotic Process Automation Readiness Barriers and Enablers in South Africa’s Energy Supply Chain. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 7(3), 3005-3024. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v7i3.1281
Section
Articles