Integrating EUCS and TAM to Evaluate DAPODIK User Satisfaction and Use in Central Lombok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i1.1426Keywords:
DAPODIK, User Satisfaction, Technology Acceptance, Educational Information Systems, Digital LiteracyAbstract
This study evaluates user satisfaction and post-adoption behavior toward the Data Pokok Pendidikan (DAPODIK) Information System by integrating the End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) within a mandatory public education system context. Although DAPODIK has been nationally enforced and widely implemented in Indonesia, empirical evidence explaining how system quality translates into user satisfaction, technology acceptance, and actual use remains limited, particularly at the local government level. A quantitative survey-based approach was employed involving 255 active DAPODIK users in Central Lombok Regency, Indonesia, collected between December 2025 and January 2026 using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. Data were analyzed using PLS-SEM, encompassing measurement model evaluation, structural model assessment, hypothesis testing, and moderation analysis of digital literacy. The findings indicate that format, ease of use, and timeliness significantly influence user satisfaction, whereas content and accuracy do not show significant effects. User satisfaction has a strong positive effect on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, while behavioral intention significantly predicts actual system use. The moderation analysis further reveals that digital literacy strengthens the relationship between technology acceptance and users’ attitudes toward system use. From a practical perspective, the results suggest that policymakers should prioritize interface format, usability simplification, and system responsiveness during data collection cycles to enhance user satisfaction and sustained system use.
Downloads
References
[1] M. A. Camilleri, “Evaluating service quality and performance of higher education institutions: a systematic review and a post-COVID-19 outlook,” International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 268–281, 2021.
[2] M. Al-Kofahi, H. Hassan, and R. Mohamad, “DeLone and McLean information systems success model: a literature review,” Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 452–481, 2025.
[3] N. A. Yasin and F. E. Elsalina, “Optimizing the Use of the Dapodik Application in School Data Synchronization to Improve the Efficiency of Education Management,” Insights: Journal of Primary Education Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 90–100, 2025.
[4] M. Hamdan and N. Al-Hajri, “The effect of information systems success factors on user satisfaction in accounting information systems,” Management Science Letters, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2045–2052, 2021.
[5] E. Elazzaoui and S. Lamari, “Delone and McLean information systems success model in the public sector: A systematic review,” Journal Of Social Science and Organization Management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 133–156, 2022.
[6] Y. M. M. Kilani, “The moderating role of innovation valance between adoption and actual use of e-government services: an extension of DeLone and McLean information success model,” International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 273–295, 2021.
[7] W. M. Tessema and N. Cavus, “Determining information system end-user satisfaction and continuance intension with a unified modeling approach,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 6882, 2024.
[8] A. J. Desmal, S. Hamid, M. K. Othman, and A. Zolait, “A user satisfaction model for mobile government services: a literature review,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 8, pp. e1074–e1074, 2022.
[9] T. Widyaningrum, Q. Sholihah, and B. S. Haryono, “The Delone and McLean information system success model: Investigating user satisfaction in learning management system,” Journal of Education Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 86–94, 2024.
[10] A. Padalia and T. Natsir, “End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) Model: Implementation of Learning Management System (LMS) on Students Satisfaction at Universities,” International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 100–107, 2022.
[11] J.-H. Han and H. J. Sa, “Acceptance of and satisfaction with online educational classes through the technology acceptance model (TAM): The COVID-19 situation in Korea,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 403–415, 2022.
[12] A. Aman, K. Imtihan, and M. Rodi, “Evaluating User Satisfaction and Public Engagement in Local Government Social Media,” International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 235–248, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.52088/ijesty.v5i3.905.
[13] K. Imtihan, Mardi, and M. Rodi, “The Impact of Visual Quality and User Interface Responsiveness on Student Satisfaction in Academic Information Systems (AIS),” Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 19896–19906, 2024, doi: 10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001455.
[14] R. A. Azdy and H. K. Putra, “Analysis of the Level of Satisfaction of Darwinbox Application Users at PT Nippon Indosari Corpindo Tbk Using the End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) Method,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 13–20, 2023.
[15] A. Nurdin and M. Lubis, “User Satisfaction Analysis of Academic Information System Using End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS),” Acceleration, Quantum, Information Technology and Algorithm Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 37–51, 2024.
[16] W. Bagye, K. Imtihan, and M. Ashari, “Evaluating User Readiness for IoT-Based Smart Home Adoption: A PLS-SEM and IPMA Study Integrating TAM and Technological Readiness Model in the Context of NTB, Indonesia,” Applied Information System and Management (AISM), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 323–332, 2025.
[17] D. Marikyan, S. Papagiannidis, and G. Stewart, “Technology acceptance research: Meta-analysis,” J. Inf. Sci., pp. 01655515231191177–01655515231191177, 2023.
[18] E. Unal and A. M. Uzun, “Understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use Edmodo through the lens of an extended technology acceptance model,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 619–637, 2021.
[19] R. Adyaputra, K. Imtihan, and M. Saleh, “Assessing User Satisfaction of Local Government Websites Through ISO 25010 and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A SmartPLS and IPMA-Based Study in Lombok Tengah,” In Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 291–312, 2025, doi: 10.31341/jios.49.2.8.
[20] L. Handayani, K. Imtihan, and H. Asyari, “Analyzing User Satisfaction with Government Websites Through the EUCS and TAM Models,” Jambura Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 167–176, 2025.
[21] M. Iqbal and M. Rafiq, “RETRACTED: DeLone and McLean’s reformulated information systems success model: a systematic review of available literature in public sector (2011-2022),” Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, vol. 74, no. 3–4, pp. 1320–1335, 2025.
[22] N. Pushparaj, V. J. Sivakumar, M. Natarajan, and A. Bhuvaneskumar, “Two decades of DeLone and Mclean IS success model: a scientometrics analysis,” Qual. Quant., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 2469–2491, 2023.
[23] H. Karuniawan, L. Mutawalli, and K. Imtihan, “Evaluating Digital Readiness and Teachers’ Perceptions of a Digital Based Performance Appraisal System in Secondary Schools,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2617–2635, 2025.
[24] A. B. Pratomo, M. A. K. Harahap, T. Oswari, P. M. Akhirianto, and A. Widarman, “The application of end user computing satisfaction (EUCS) to analyze the satisfaction of mypertamina user,” Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi, pp. 78–83, 2023.
[25] A. V Martín-García, R. Redolat, and S. Pinazo-Hernandis, “Factors influencing intention to technological use in older adults. The TAM model aplication,” Res. Aging, vol. 44, no. 7–8, pp. 573–588, 2022.
[26] S. Zaineldeen and L. Hongbo, “Evaluate student satisfaction of student information system utilising technology acceptance model and trust in China,” Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 283–309, 2021.
[27] G. D. P. Aryono, S. Auliana, B. R. S. Permana, R. Arief, and M. Azis, “Audit of the Basic Education Data Application Information System (Dapodik) Juhut 1 State Primary School,” ARRUS Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2024.
[28] R. Novendra, N. Jalinus, W. Waskito, A. Afriansyah, and A. Rasfira, “User satisfaction analysis of service quality of Dapodik applications (educational data) using Servqual method,” J. Appl. Eng. Technol. Sci, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 190–194, 2022.
[29] E. Arribe, N. C. Nawi, and S. A. Zainuddin, “Human competency effect on the usage of government school information system ‘DAPODIK’ in Pekanbaru City: a conceptual paper,” in Finance, Accounting and Law in the Digital Age: The Impact of Technology and Innovation in the Financial Services Sector, Springer, 2023, pp. 401–406.
[30] S. Sudarno, H. Safitri, A. T. Junaedi, A. R. Tanjung, and M. B. Hutahuruk, “Effect of Leadership Style, Work Discipline, and Competency on Job Satisfaction and Performance of Dapodik Operator Employees in Bengkalis District,” in International Conference on Business Management and Accounting, 2023, pp. 385–400.
[31] C. M. Gibran, C. W. Budiyanto, and R. A. Yuana, “Application of the Delone and mclean information system success model to evaluate the success of web-based system adoption-A literature review,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, 2023, p. 80035.
[32] P. Saba et al., “The DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model: What is the Future Evolution for Its Foundations, Components, and Applications?,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 57, no. 1, p. 52, 2025.
[33] M. Iqbal, M. Rafiq, and S. H. Soroya, “Examining predictors of digital library use: an application of the information system success model,” The Electronic Library, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 359–375, 2022.
[34] I. Kurniawan, Y. T. Ardianto, and S. Hidayatullah, “The effect of the information system quality, service quality, and user satisfaction on academic information system user loyalty,” International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 350–355, 2021.
[35] J. Hair and A. Alamer, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example,” Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 100027, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027.
[36] J. F. Hair Jr et al., “An introduction to structural equation modeling,” Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook, pp. 1–29, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1.
[37] J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, S. P. Gudergan, A. Fischer, C. Nitzl, and C. Menictas, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice,” Business Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 115–142, 2019.
[38] X. An et al., “Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools,” Educ. Inf. Technol. (Dordr)., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 5187–5208, 2023.
[39] H. M. Alzoubi, “Factors affecting ChatGPT use in education employing TAM: A Jordanian universities’ perspective,” International Journal of Data and Network Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1599–1606, 2024.
[40] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Jan. 14, 2019, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors Declaration
- The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
- The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
- The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
- The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
- The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
- The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
- If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
- The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights
