Modeling EMIS Adoption with PLS-SEM: Integrating the Government Adoption Model and DeLone–McLean IS Success Model

Authors

  • Mardiyanto Mardiyanto Indonesia
  • Berlilana Berlilana Indonesia
  • Purwadi Purwadi Indonesia
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i1.1445

Keywords:

DeLone & McLean, E-Government Adoption, GAM, Information Quality, PLS-SEM, Trust

Abstract

This study explores the key factors influencing the adoption of the Education Management Information System (EMIS) within Indonesia's Ministry of Religious Affairs (Kemenag), which is vital for managing data and distributing Teacher Professional Allowances (TPG). Data inconsistencies have been a significant challenge, leading to delays in TPG disbursement. To understand the determinants of EMIS adoption, this study integrates the Government Adoption Model (GAM) and DeLone & McLean’s (D&M) Information Systems Success Model. A quantitative approach was used, collecting data from 328 valid responses from MTsN teachers in Kebumen Regency, analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that Perceived Uncertainty (PU), Perceived Security (PSC), and Perceived Privacy (PP) positively contribute to Perceived Trust (PT). Additionally, Information Quality (IQ) emerged as the strongest predictor of EMIS adoption, followed by System Quality (SYQ), Service Responsiveness (PSR), and Trust. The study emphasizes that improving data accuracy (IQ), ensuring system reliability (SYQ), and strengthening security measures (PSC) are critical for accelerating EMIS adoption. The findings offer practical implications for Kemenag to optimize the implementation of EMIS, ultimately improving the efficiency and timeliness of TPG disbursements for educators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] G. Puron-cid, D. E. Luna, S. Picazo-vela, J. Ram, R. Sandoval-almazan, and L. F. Luna-reyes, “Improving the Assessment of Digital Services in Government Websites : Evidence From the Mexican State Government Portals Ranking,” Gov. Inf. Quartely, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101589.

[2] S. Kumar and M. S. Bhatia, “Environmental dynamism, industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating role of organizational and technological factors,” Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 95, no. March, pp. 54–64, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.03.010.

[3] A. F. Yusri and Jumaruddin, “Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Berbasis Education Management Information System (Emis),” Educ. Leadersh. J. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 223–233, 2024, doi: 10.24252/edu.v3i2.39090.

[4] M. Mundzir, “Transforming Management of Islamic Educational Institutions in Indonesia: Concepts, Strategic Shifts, and Implementation Challenges,” Al-Tahrir J. Pemikir. Islam, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 395–412, 2025, doi: 10.21154/altahrir.v25i2.11551.

[5] A. Latip, “Peran Literasi Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Edukasi dan Teknol. Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 107–115, 2020, doi: 10.51878/edutech.v1i1.176.

[6] S. Maulani, N. Nuraisyah, D. Zarina, I. Velinda, and A. N. Aeni, “Analisis Penggunaan Video sebagai Media Pembelajaran Terpadu terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia , Indonesia Judul Bahasa Inggris,” J. Pendidik. dan Teknol. Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2022, doi: 10.52436/1.jpti.134.

[7] L. Senduk, H. Karamloy, and L. Kalangi, “Pengaruh Kemampuan Personal, Kecanggihan Teknologi Informasi, Dan Dukungan Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan BUMN Bidang Jasa Konstruksi di Kota Manado),” J. Ris. Akunt. dan Audit. “GOODWILL,” vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 194–206, 2021, doi: 10.35800/jjs.v12i2.36356.

[8] Y. Umaroh, R. P. Tuala, and Irwandani, “Analisis Implementasi EMIS: Meningkatkan Layanan Administrasi dan Pengembangan Guru Profesional di Madrasah,” Jutisi J. Ilm. Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 312–322, 2025, doi: 10.35889/jutisi.v14i1.2629.

[9] S. E. Setyowati, “Ulul Amri : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Implementasi Penggunaan Aplikasi SIAGA Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Layanan Tunjangan Profesi Guru Di Seksi PAIS Kantor Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Banyuwangi,” Ulul Amri J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 111–117, 2025, doi: 10.18860/uajmpi.v4i1.7968.

[10] G. R. Tambunan and L. M. Ginting, “Comparison of Heuristic Evaluation and Cognitive Walkthrough Methods in Doing Usability Evaluation of Mobile-Based Del Egov Centre Hospital Information System,” in Seminastika, 2021, pp. 99–106. doi: 10.47002/seminastika.v3i1.244.

[11] D. Al-Fraihat, M. Joy, R. Masa’deh, and J. Sinclair, “Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 102, no. August 2019, pp. 67–86, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.

[12] M. A. Almaiah, A. Al-Khasawneh, A. Althunibat, and S. Khawatreh, “Mobile Government Adoption Model Based on Combining GAM and UTAUT to Explain Factors According to Adoption of Mobile Government Services,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 199–225, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i03.11264.

[13] A. K. Darmawan, D. O. Siahaan, T. D. Susanto, M. Walid, B. A. Umam, and A. N. Hidayanto, “Identifying the Differing Service Maturity Levels of Mobile-based Smart Regency with e-Government Adoption Model (GAM) framework,” 7th Int. Conf. ICT Smart Soc. AIoT Smart Soc. ICISS 2020 - Proceeding, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICISS50791.2020.9307540.

[14] W. H. Delone and E. R. Mclean, “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.

[15] S. Maghfiroh and I. K. D. Nuryana, “Penerapan Metode TAM dan DeLone And McLean IS Succes untuk Mengevaluasi Keberhasilan Aplikasi Lazada,” JEISBI J. Emerg. Inf. Syst. Bus. Intell., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 24–32, 2022, doi: https:/doi.org/10.26740/jeisbi.v3i3.46680.

[16] Kementerian Agama R.I., “EMIS: Education Management Information System.”

[17] N. Wattimena, K. D. Hartomo, and H. Hong, “User Satisfaction Analysis Using a Combination of End User Computing Satisfaction and Servqual on the Maluku Province KEMENAG ’ s Website,” pp. 150–178, 2025, doi: 10.20895/INFOTEL.V17I1.1264.

[18] M. A. Almaiah, R. Alfaisal, and S. A. Salloum, “Determinants Influencing the Continuous Intention to Use Digital Technologies in Higher Education,” J. Electron., vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11182827.

[19] E. Sofiani, E. D. S. Mulyani, and T. Mufizar, “Analisis Keberhasilan Penggunaan Education Management Information System (EMIS) 4.0 Menggunakan MEtode Delone and Mclean,” J. Rekayasa Inf. Swadharma, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 108–118, 2022, doi: 10.56486/jris.vol5no1.713.

[20] H. Haryono, F. Muslihul Amin, and N. Ulinnuha, “Faktor Kesuksesan Smart Mobility Menggunakan DeLone McLean dan E-Government Adoption Models,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 08, no. 02, pp. 87–99, 2023, doi: 10.33506/insect.v8i2.2210.

[21] L. Kou and X. Sun, “The Influence of Perceived Trust, Perceived Value, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Risk on College Students’ Initial Willingness to Pay for Online Knowledge,” Creat. Bus. Sustain. J., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2024, doi: 10.58837/chula.cbsj.46.1.1.

[22] I. K. Mensah, G. E. Dadson, D. S. Mwakapesa, and V. F. Ukolov, “The determinants of Mobile government services adoption: The moderating effect of perceived government support (PGS),” Inf. Dev., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 110–130, 2024, doi: 10.1177/02666669221089656.

[23] M. A. Almaiah, A. Al-Rahmi, and F. Alturise, “Investigating the Effect of Perceived Security, Perceived Trust, and Information Quality on Mobile Payment Usage through Near-Field Communication (NFC) in Saudi Arabia,” Electron., vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11233926.

[24] T. Puspitasari, A. Kusumawati, and S. Sujarwoto, “Aplikasi Model DeLone and McLean untuk Mengukur Keberhasilan Sistem Informasi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat di Universitas Brawijaya,” J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 94–104, 2020, doi: 10.21456/vol10iss1pp94-104.

[25] N. M. Firdaus, Y. T. Ardianto, and N. Sisharini, “Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem, Kualitas Informasi dan Kualitas Layanan Platform Pembelajaran Daring terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna,” J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 70–80, 2024, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v10i1.12294.

[26] J. F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, and V. G. Kuppelwieser, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 106–121, 2014, doi: 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.

[27] H. Santoso, Z. Akbar, and H. Helmina, “Analisis Sistem Informasi Keberhasilan Website Siap Ppdb Online Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Jambi Dengan Metode Delone and Mclean,” J. Inform. Sist. Inf. dan Kehutan., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.53978/jfsa.v1i2.244.

[28] R. Kharismawan, E. Pramana, and Y. Kristian, “Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Informatika Factors Influencing Mobile Payment Adoption Utilizing Extended UTAUT with a Case Study : Public Transportation Trans Jatim Buses,” vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 69–80, 2025, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v11i1.15649.

[29] M. Shafique, “The Role of Modified Umega Model In Predicting E- Government Service Adoption In Developing Countries,” Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, vol. 03, no. 02, 2025.

[30] Y. A. Kanthi and S. Aminah, “Evaluasi Faktor Keberhasilan dan Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Pengaduan Online Kota Malang,” J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 129–140, 2023, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v9i2.11036.

[31] G. B. Akrong, Y. Shao, and E. Owusu, “Evaluation of organizational climate factors on tax administration enterprise resource planning (ERP) system,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 6, p. e09642, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09642.

[32] C. Sa’adah and G. S. Palupi, “Gabungan E-Government Adoption Model dan UTAUT Untuk Mengetahui Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Adopsi Aplikasi Klampid New Generation (KNG) Dispendukcapil Kota Surabaya,” J. Emerg. Inf. Syst. Bus. Intell., vol. 04, no. 03, pp. 126–138, 2023, doi: 10.26740/jeisbi.v4i3.55157.

[33] N. Hafizah, M. Husaini, and A. Budiman, “Implementasi Education Management Information System (Emis) Di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Hidayatush Shibyan Kandris Kabupaten …,” Al Iidara Balad, pp. 123–129, 2024, doi: 10.36658/aliidarabalad.

[34] G. Eibl, T. Lampoltshammer, and L. Temple, “Towards Identifying Factors Influencing Mobile Government Adoption: An Exploratory Literature Review,” eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.29379/jedem.v14i1.693.

[36] N. Hamidah, P. Agustriani, and T. Sutabri, “Analisis Domain Deliver, Service dan Support Untuk Pengukuran Kualitas Layanan E-Government Menggunakan Framework Cobit 5.0,” J. Inf. Technol. Ampera, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2774–2121, 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalita.v5i1.514.

[37] M. Csótó, “Examining the role of the knowledge gap as a driver towards e-Government service adoption,” Cent. East. Eur. eDem eGov Days, vol. 335, pp. 45–56, 2022, doi: 10.24989/ocg.v335.3.

[38] M. I. Nofal, A. S. Al-Adwan, H. Yaseen, and G. A. A. Alsheikh, “Factors for extending e-government adoption in Jordan,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 471–490, 2021, doi: 10.21533/pen.v9i2.1824.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-02

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): February

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information Systems and Informatics

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors Declaration

  1. The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
  2. The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
  3. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
  4. The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
  5. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
  6. The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
  7. If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
  8. The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights

How to Cite

[1]
M. Mardiyanto, B. Berlilana, and P. Purwadi, “Modeling EMIS Adoption with PLS-SEM: Integrating the Government Adoption Model and DeLone–McLean IS Success Model”, journalisi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 889–906, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.63158/journalisi.v8i1.1445.

Most read articles by the same author(s)