UTAUT-Based Analysis of Factors Associated with Microsoft Teams Use in Digital Learning among Undergraduate Students

Authors

  • Cintya Syarah Azzahra Tarumanagara University, Indonesia
  • Jap Tji Beng Tarumanagara University, Indonesia
  • Sri Tiatri Tarumanagara University, Indonesia
  • Fouad Nagm BT Financial Group, Australia
  • Rahmiyana Nurkholiza Binus University, Indonesia
  • Vienchenzia Oeyta Dwitama Dinatha INTI International University, Malaysia
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i3.1697

Keywords:

UTAUT, Microsoft Teams, Digital Learning, Behavioral Intention, Use Behavior, Higher Education

Abstract

This study examined factors influencing Microsoft Teams adoption in digital learning using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted with 268 undergraduate students, and data were analyzed using reliability testing, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), classical assumption testing, and multiple linear regression. The results showed that Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Social Influence significantly influenced Behavioral Intention, while Facilitating Conditions and Behavioral Intention significantly influenced Use Behavior. The model explained 60.2% of the variance in Behavioral Intention and 46.4% of the variance in Use Behavior. CFA demonstrated acceptable fit for most indices, although RMSEA indicated marginal fit. Performance Expectancy was the strongest predictor of Behavioral Intention, whereas Behavioral Intention was the strongest predictor of Use Behavior. Unlike previous studies focusing primarily on Behavioral Intention, this study also examined its relationship with self-reported Use Behavior among Indonesian undergraduates. The findings highlight the importance of usefulness, ease of use, social support, and facilitating conditions in promoting Microsoft Teams adoption for digital learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] T. M. Alam, G. A. Stoica, K. Sharma, and Ö. Özgöbek, “Digital technologies in the classrooms in the last decade (2014–2023): a bibliometric analysis,” 2025, Frontiers Media SA. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1533588.

[2] Elidjen, A. Pertiwi, T. N. Mursitama, and J. T. Beng, “How potential and realized absorptive capacity increased ability to innovate: The moderating role of structural ambidexterity,” VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 15–33, 2025, doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0298.

[3] D. J. Surjawan, A. Z. R. Langi, and R. V. Imbar, “Digital Transformation for Institution Operations in Higher Education: A Literature Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 61457–61468, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3557446.

[4] D. L. Choi-Lundberg, K. Butler-Henderson, K. Harman, and J. Crawford, “A systematic review of digital innovations in technology-enhanced learning designs in higher education,” 2023. doi: 10.14742/ajet.7615.

[5] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS quarterly, vol.27, no.3, 2003, doi: 10.2307/30036540

[6] T. B. Jap, F. Lusiana, K. Larasati, and S. Tiatri, “Penjajakan penerapan sistem manajemen pengetahuan di sekolah menengah kejuruan,” Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 293–299, 2021, doi: 10.24912/jmishumsen.v5i1.10002.2021

[7] A. T. Rosário and J. C. Dias, “Learning Management Systems in Education,” 2022, pp. 47–77. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4706-2.ch003.

[8] S. Simelane-Mnisi, "Effectiveness of LMS Digital Tools Used by the Academics to Foster Students’ Engagement," Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 10, art. no. 980, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13100980.

[9] M. I. Alhusban, N. Sarhan, I. N. Khatatbeh, and M. O. Al Shbail, "Exploring How Quality Dimensions Enhance Videoconferencing Platform Benefits from an Information Systems Success Perspective," Discover Sustainability, vol. 5, art. no. 59, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00215-4.

[10] J. T. Beng, S. Tiatri, V. H. Wangi, and F. Lusiana, “Learning Through KMS Model Using Video Conference to Optimize the Absorptive Capacity of Vocational School Students During COVID-19 Pandemic,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020), Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.201209.115

[11] L. Stramkale, "University Students’ Perspectives on Online Learning via the Microsoft Teams Platform," J. Educ. Cult. Soc., no. 1, pp. 400–414, 2023.

[12] T. Jap, “The Technology Acceptance Model of Online Game in Indonesian Adolescents,” Makara Hubs-Asia, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 65–73, 2017.

[13] J. T. Beng, S. Tiatri, M. Zheng, R. Nurkholiza, V. Dinatha, and T. M. Salsabila, “Development of a Training Model on the Use of Laser Engraving Technology for Vocational High School Female Students in Semi-Urban Areas: Gender Equality in Education,” TEM Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1860–1866, May 2025, doi: 10.18421/TEM142-82.

[14] J. H. Ye, Y. S. Lee, C. L. Wang, W. Nong, J. N. Ye, and Y. Sun, “The Continuous Use Intention for the Online Learning of Chinese Vocational Students in the Post-Epidemic Era: The Extended Technology Acceptance Model and Expectation Confirmation Theory,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 3, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15031819.

[15] S. A. Raza, W. Qazi, K. A. Khan, and J. Salam, “Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 183–208, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0735633120960421.

[16] Y. H. S. Al-Mamary, “Understanding the use of learning management systems by undergraduate university students using the UTAUT model: Credible evidence from Saudi Arabia,” International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, vol. 2, no. 2, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100092.

[17] H. Zheng, F. Han, Y. Huang, Y. Wu, and X. Wu, “Factors influencing behavioral intention to use e-learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analytic review based on the UTAUT2 model,” Educ. Inf. Technol. (Dordr)., vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 12015–12053, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13299-2.

[18] H. Zheng, Y. Qian, Z. Wang, and Y, Wu, “Research on the Influence of E-Learning Quality on the Intention to Continue E-Learning: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 6, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15065557

[19] A. Ayaz, F. Demir, E. Bahçekapılı, and A. K. Kabakuş, “Acceptance of Digital Learning Tools in Higher Education: A Case Study of Microsoft Teams Application,” Trends in Business and Economics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 220–230, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.16951/trendbusecon.1581151.

[20] H. Baber, “Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea,” International Journal of Management Education, vol. 19, no. 2, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503.

[21] P. N. Dharmadjaja and S. Tiatri, “The Effect of Online Interaction Types and Acceptance of Technology Factors on Student Satisfaction with Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Business, Social, and Humanities (ICEBSH 2021), 2021. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210805.148.

[22] L. Y. Leong, T. S. Hew, K. B. Ooi, G. W. H. Tan, and A. Koohang, “An SEM-ANN approach-guidelines in information systems research,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 706–737, 2025, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2024.2329128.

[23] R. B. Amotz, G. Green, G. Joseph, S. Levi, N. Manor, K. Ng, S. Barak, Y. Hutzler, and R. Tesler, “Remote Teaching, Self-Resilience, Stress, Professional Efficacy, and Subjective Health among Israeli PE Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Educ. Sci. (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 6, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12060405

[24] H. Patil and S. Undale, "Willingness of university students to continue using e-learning platforms after compelled adoption of technology: Test of an extended UTAUT model," Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, pp. 14943–14965, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11778-6.

[25] A. Alshurideh, B. H. Al Kurdi, S. A. Salloum, et al., "The acceptance and use of Microsoft Teams as a learning platform among university students," Hum. Syst. Manag., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.3233/HSM-220032.

[26] A. Oliemat, S. Khasawneh, M. Alkhazaleh, J. Abu-Alruz, and N. Hamadneh, "Microsoft Teams as an online education system in higher education: The case for Jordan," Int. J. Educ. Pract., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 851–863, 2024, doi: 10.18488/61.v12i3.3761.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)