Factors Influencing Generative AI Adoption for Knowledge Management in South Africa’s Automotive Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i1.1393Keywords:
Generative AI, Knowledge Management, Automotive Manufacturing, Technology Adoption, Ethical Governance (FATAA)Abstract
South Africa’s automotive sector is under increasing pressure to sustain competitiveness amid Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) transitions, persistent operational inefficiencies, and workforce ageing. Generative AI (GenAI) presents a potential pathway to strengthen knowledge management (KM) by supporting faster knowledge capture, synthesis, retrieval, and decision support. This study identifies the determinants of GenAI adoption for improving KM practices in South Africa’s automotive context. A quantitative, hypothesis-driven design was employed, integrating constructs from the PPOA, TEOG, and IEO frameworks to provide a consolidated adoption perspective. Survey data were collected from 142 industry participants and analysed using SPSS (correlation and multiple regression). The model demonstrated strong explanatory power (Adjusted R² = 0.624, p < 0.001). Results indicate that GenAI adoption is significantly and positively influenced by FATAA ethical principles, KM practices, GenAI tool capability, perceived enjoyment, perceived usefulness, compatibility, competition intensity, organisational size, mimetic pressure, and normative pressure (p < 0.05). In contrast, perceived ease of use and coercive pressure were not statistically significant in this context (p > 0.05). The study contributes a context-specific, integrated adoption model for GenAI-enabled KM in an under-researched setting and offers actionable implications for managers and policymakers focused on responsible, effective GenAI deployment.
Downloads
References
[1] P. Budhwar, A. Malik, M. T. De Silva, and P. Thevisuthan, “Artificial intelligence–challenges and opportunities for international HRM: A review and research agenda,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1065–1097, 2022.
[2] D. K. Kanbach, L. Heiduk, G. Blueher, M. Schreiter, and A. Lahmann, “The GenAI is out of the bottle: Generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective,” Rev. Manag. Sci., pp. 1–32, 2023.
[3] N. C. Hernández, “Adoption and adaptation of generative artificial intelligence in organizations: Actions for efficient and responsible use in interaction with collaborators,” Int. J. Curr. Sci. Res. Rev., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1940–1947, 2024.
[4] D. Kaczorowska-Spychalska, N. Kotula, G. Mazurek, and Ł. Sułkowski, “Generative AI as source of change of knowledge management paradigm,” Hum. Technol., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 131–154, 2024.
[5] L. Villardon and C. Yániz, “Strategic insights unleashed: Harnessing the potential of machine learning in business,” J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 127–137, 2024.
[6] S. Feuerriegel, J. Hartmann, C. Janiesch, and P. Zschech, “Generative AI,” Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 111–126, 2024.
[7] V. W. B. Martins, I. S. Rampasso, R. Anholon, O. L. G. Quelhas, and W. Leal Filho, “Knowledge management in the context of sustainability: Literature review and opportunities for future research,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 229, pp. 489–500, 2019.
[8] J. M. Ikome, O. T. Laseinde, and M. G. K. Katumba, “The future of the automotive manufacturing industry in developing nations: A case study of its sustainability based on South Africa’s paradigm,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 200, pp. 1165–1173, 2022.
[9] W. Maisiri and L. Van Dyk, “Industry 4.0 skills: A perspective of the South African manufacturing industry,” SA J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 19, p. 1416, 2021.
[10] W. Macpherson, A. Werner, and M. Mey, “Industry 4.0: Emerging job categories and associated competencies in the automotive industry in South Africa,” SA J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 20, p. 1916, 2022, doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v20i0.1916.
[11] S. Vadari and C. Malladi, “Generative knowledge management for financial inclusion through financial literacy: A systematic review,” IUP J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 22, no. 1, 2024.
[12] J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2017.
[13] W. R. Shadish, T. D. Cook, and D. T. Campbell, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.
[14] R. Kumar, Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners, 5th ed. London, U.K.: Sage, 2018.
[15] L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 5th ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2002.
[16] P. Pandey and M. M. Pandey, Research Methodology: Tools and Techniques. Bridge Center, 2021.
[17] D. S. Pace, “Probability and non-probability sampling—An entry point for undergraduate researchers,” Int. J. Quant. Qual. Res. Methods, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2021.
[18] R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Table for determining sample size from a given population,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, 1970.
[19] E. Varghese, S. Jaggi, R. Gills, and J. Jayasankar, “IBM SPSS Statistics: An overview,” 2023.
[20] N. K. Kayesa and M. Shung-King, “The role of document analysis in health policy analysis studies in low- and middle-income countries: Lessons for HPA researchers from a qualitative systematic review,” Health Policy Open, vol. 2, p. 100024, 2021.
[21] V. Gupta and H. Yang, “Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology adoption model for entrepreneurs: Case of ChatGPT,” Internet Ref. Serv. Q., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 223–242, 2024.
[22] K. P. Agrawal, “Towards adoption of generative AI in organizational settings,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst., pp. 1–16, 2023.
[23] N. P. Rana, R. Pillai, B. Sivathanu, and N. Malik, “Assessing the nexus of generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance,” Technovation, vol. 135, p. 103064, 2024.
[24] H. Benbya, F. Strich, and T. Tamm, “Navigating generative AI: Promises and perils for knowledge and creative work,” 2023.
[25] V. Gupta, “An empirical evaluation of a generative artificial intelligence technology adoption model from entrepreneurs’ perspectives,” Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 103, 2024.
[26] V. Chittipaka, S. Kumar, U. Sivarajah, J. L.-H. Bowden, and M. M. Baral, “Blockchain technology for supply chains operating in emerging markets: An empirical examination of the TOE framework,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 327, no. 1, pp. 465–492, 2023.
[27] L. Zhang, Z. Shao, B. Chen, and J. Benitez, “Unraveling generative AI adoption in enterprise digital platforms: The effect of institutional pressures and the moderating role of internal and external environments,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 72, pp. 335–348, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors Declaration
- The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
- The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
- The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
- The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
- The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
- The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
- If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
- The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights
